The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Evaluation of oral fluid specimens for syphilis testing

Lina M. Castro1, S.R. Leon2, H. Hasebe3, Mary Williams4, R. De la Roca4, Leah Rauch1, Sally Liska1, and J.D. Klausner4. (1) San Francisco Public Health Laboratory, 101 Grove St, Rm 419, San Francisco, CA, USA, (2) Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru, (3) Business Development, Fujirebio Diagnostics, Inc, Malvern, PA, USA, (4) STD Prevention and Control Services, San Francisco Department of Public Health, 1360 Mission St, Suite # 401, San Francisco, CA, USA


Background:
Testing for syphilis relies on the collection of venous blood specimens for serological analysis. However, there is a need to identify new diagnostic tests that do not require phlebotomists for specimen collection. In 2003, the FDA-clearance of OraSure for HIV antibody testing revealed the potential of utilizing oral fluid in diagnostic testing. We investigated the use of oral fluid specimens for syphilis testing.


Objective:
We sought to determine the feasability of using oral fluid as a specimen for syphilis (TPPA) testing.

Method:
We compared Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination (TPPA) test results from contemporaneously collected oral fluid with venous specimens from the same patient. We used the OraSure HIV-1 oral fluid collection device and tested oral fluid for the presence of syphilis antibodies using the Serodia TPPA kit (Fujirebio, Japan). TPPA-reactive serum specimens were also analyzed by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test (Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA) to measure VDRL titer.

Result:
Among 250 patients, 168 (67%) had syphilis infection. There were 20 (12%) paired specimens positive by both specimen types; 148 (88%) specimens were found TPPA-positive in serum while TPPA-negative in oral fluid TPPA; 79 specimens were TPPA-negative in both oral fluid and serum; 3 specimens were TPPA-positive in oral fluid and negative in serum. The sensitivity and specificity of TPPA using oral fluid was 12% and 96% respectively. TPPA performance did not correlate with VDRL titer.


Conclusion:
Oral fluid can also be used as an analyte in TPPA analysis with little impact in assay specificity. The use of oral fluid as a specimen in TPPA results in an approximate 8-fold loss in assay sensitivity when compared to serum TPPA. Further research is needed to improve the sensitivity of the TPPA in oral fluid specimens for clinical use.


Implications:
This work investigates a new TPPA methodology that may facilitate broader screening for syphilis.