Jonathan L. Temte1, Herbert F. Young
2, and Bellinda K. Schoof
2. (1) Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin, 777 South Mills Street, Madison, WI, USA, (2) American Academy of Family Physicians, 11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway, Leawood, KS, USA
Learning Objectives for this Presentation:
By the end of this presentation participants will be able to identify physician-rated most appropriate venues for administration of influenza vaccine and have a better understanding of problems associated with vaccine supply issues in primary care.
Background:
Physician members of the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) provide influenza vaccine to millions of American each year. Moreover, family physicians (FPs) directly experience practice-centered issues associated with vaccine delays and shortages.
Objectives:
To better define usual administration of influenza vaccine, the AAFP—through a CDC cooperative agreement—conducted three annual membership surveys.
Methods:
Surveys were mailed to randomly selected samples of clinically-active AAFP members in 2004 (n=2192), 2005 (n=4720), and 2006 (n=5000) and contained 5, 10 and 9 questions pertaining to influenza issues, respectively. Summary statistics were evaluated. Approaches were compared between years and among demographic groups using chi square and ANOVA as appropriate.
Results:
Modest return rates were achieved (2004: 46.5%; 2005: 48.3%; 2006: 52.4%). FPs identified physician offices (98.6%), nursing homes (95.8%), public health clinics (95.3%) and hospitals (93.6%) as appropriate venues for influenza vaccine administration. Pharmacies (44.3%) and retailers (26.5%) were viewed as less appropriate. During the 2005-2006 influenza season (delayed vaccine), 32% had vaccine left over at the end of season; 17.9% reported problems with ordering for 2006-2007. Over three years, a decline in clinic employees routinely immunized occured (P<0.001). Despite delays and shortages, a majority and increasing percentage of FPs favor a recommendation for universal influenza vaccination if supplies are adequate and assured (2005: 67.6% vs. 2006: 69.5%; P<0.001). Moreover, fewer FPs in 2006 had concerns regarding thimerosal than in 2005 (18.0% vs.21.0%; P<0.001).
Conclusions:
FPs are supportive of influenza vaccination and are an essential component of the influenza prevention system, but are highly susceptible to delays and shortages in vaccine.