The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Wednesday, May 10, 2006
277

Sexual History Taking among Metro-Atlanta Physicians

Yolanda Wimberly1, Matthew Hogben2, Yvonne Fry-Johnson3, Sandra Moore1, and Jada Moore-Ruffin4. (1) Pediatrics, Morehouse School of Medicine, 720 Westview Dr., SW, Atlanta, GA, USA, (2) CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA, (3) National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, 720 Westview Dr., SW, Atlanta, GA, USA, (4) Family Medicine, The OhioHealth, Grant Medical Center, 4850 East Main St, Columbus, OH, USA


Background:
Taking sexual histories provides opportunities for physicians to assess patients' risk factors for sexual dysfunction and STDs and effectively counsel patients.




Objective:
To determine the sexual history taking and practices of Metro Atlanta primary care physicians in the fields of family medicine, internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and pediatrics.


Method:
Surveys were initially mailed via Federal Express to a random selection of 1,500 primary care physicians drawn from a local comprehensive physician database. Second and third rounds of surveys were mailed via the US Postal Service to non-responders. 416 surveys were returned (34% response rate after adjusting for undelivered mail and ineligible deliveries). Survey content fell into three domains: (1) training, (2) attitudes, and (3) behaviors, all pertaining to taking a sexual history. Physicians used 5-point Likert scales and check boxes to respond.


Result:
Physicians reported mean levels of training between “some” and “adequate” with respect to taking a sexual history: 56% reported adequate or more than adequate training for taking sexual histories; 64% reported the same for screening and treating. Physicians generally reported that taking a sexual history did not take too much time (57% rarely or never), was important (77% fairly or extremely), was relevant to medical care (85% fairly or extremely), and that they were comfortable taking one (79% fairly or extremely). However, only 58% took sexual histories on a routine basis (annually or at every visit), and fewer yet addressed relevant components of a complete sexual history. Less than a third of physicians who reported they took routine sexual histories asked about abuse histories, sexual practices, or partners' sexual practices.


Conclusion:
Sexual history taking is very important and relevant to most physicians

Implications:
Primary care physicians generally appreciate the need for sexual histories, but need training and practice on appropriate content.