The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Tuesday, May 9, 2006 - 10:30 AM
31

Attitudes and Beliefs of Pharmacists-in-Training Regarding HIV/STD Counseling

Richard C. Goldsworthy, Academic Edge, Inc, PO Box 5307, Bloomington, IN, USA, M. Aaron Sayegh, Adolescent Medicine, Academic Edge, Inc. and Indiana University School of Medicine, 518 N' Oriental St, Indianapolis, IN, USA, and J. Dennis Fortenberry, Department of Pediatrics/ Section of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 575 N' West Dr. Rm 070, Indianapolis, IN, USA.


Background:
Pharmacists may play an important role in HIV/STD surveillance, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and counseling. Understanding decisions by pharmacists-in-training to engage in HIV/STD counseling is an important part of understanding current practice and of improving education and training.


Objective:
To understand the relationship between pharmacists-in-training's attitudes and beliefs, and their intentions to engage in HIV/STD counseling.

Method:
78 participants answered 39 items regarding their beliefs, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived barriers to providing HIV/STD counseling. A two step cluster analysis was performed in SPSS.

Result:
48% of the respondents indicated they do not intend (“Non-Intenders”) and 62% indicated they do intend (“Intenders”) to provide HIV/STD counseling. Only the belief that the patient viewed counseling as unnecessary was significantly correlated with intention to engage (r =-0.25). Step one of the cluster analysis identified three clusters. Step two examined and compared mean scores between-clusters (Cluster 1, 2 and 3) and within-clusters (Intenders and Non-Intenders). Cluster 1 has the lowest mean score for an item concerning the presence of established rules in the workplace. Cluster 1 was named “Hesitant Counselors.” These pharmacists may be unlikely to provide HIV/STD counseling but are more likely to do so if it is required. Cluster 2 has a fairly high mean score for privacy and the highest mean score for time; therefore, Cluster 2 was named “Practical Counselors.” These pharmacists will likely counsel if there are available resources (time and privacy). Cluster 3 has the highest mean scores for beliefs regarding patient reluctance; therefore, Cluster 3 was named "Engaged Counselors." These pharmacists appear likely to engage in HIV/STD counseling behaviors unless they perceive patient reluctance.

Conclusion:
Pharmacists-in-training appear to cluster into three distinct groups in terms of their willingness to engage in HIV/STD counseling.

Implications:
These differences should be considered in future research, intervention, and prevention efforts.