The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Thursday, May 11, 2006 - 9:50 AM
365

Partner notification for syphilis: an innovative approach at Howard Brown Health Center

Beau Gratzer, Howard Brown Health Center, 4025 N. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL, USA, Carol Ciesielski, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chicago Department of Health, 530 E 31st Street 2nd floor, Chicago, IL, USA, and Irina Tabidze, STD/HIV Prevention Program, Chicago Department Public Health, 530 E 31st Street, Chicago, IL, USA.


Background:
In 2003, 43/267 (16%) of all primary and secondary syphilis (P&S) cases in Chicago were diagnosed at Howard Brown Health Center (HBHC), a lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community health center. Beginning in 6/2002, HBHC employed a Disease Intervention Specialist (DIS) to conduct case management of all syphilis cases treated at HBHC.

Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of this program.

Method:
A retrospective case audit compared outcomes of HBHC DIS-managed cases with those managed by CDPH DIS, who provided case management before 6/2002. Cases of early syphilis diagnosed and treated at HBHC between 1/2000 – 12/2003 were analyzed.

Result:
Of 232 cases reviewed, HBHC conducted 124 (53.4%) investigations; 108 (46.6%) were conducted by CDPH. Of CDPH managed cases, 43 (39.8%) were lost to follow-up, compared to 6 (4.8%) of HBHC cases (p<0.01). Of the remaining 183 cases, the median number of days between treatment and interview was 26 for CDPH and 1 (one) for HBHC. DIS from CDPH elicited at least one partner in 29/108 (26.9%) cases, compared to 63/124 (50.8%) for HBHC DIS (p<0.01). Of 191 sex partners elicited, 50 (26.2%) were elicited by CDPH DIS and 141 (73.8%) by HBHC; partner index (elicited partners/cases interviewed) was 0.463 for CDPH and 1.14 for HBHC. There were 13 infected sex partners treated, two (15.4%) by CDPH and 11 (84.6%) by HBHC; and 63 sex partners possibly in the incubation period who received preventive treatment, nine (14.3%) by CDPH and 54 (85.7%) by HBHC.

Conclusion:
The productiveness of the HBHC DIS suggests that collaborations between community health centers and health departments can provide an effective alternative to traditional syphilis case investigation and partner notification.

Implications:
Whether the success is related to more timely interventions or culturally appropriate interviewing techniques should be further studied.