The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Wednesday, May 10, 2006 - 10:45 AM
230

Concordance in Decision Making for STD Vaccination Between Parents and Adolescents

Beth E. Juliar1, Rita M. Bair2, Gregory D. Zimet2, Lynne A. Sturm3, Rose M. Mays4, and Susan M. Perkins1. (1) Division of Biostatistics, Department of the School of Medicine, Indiana University, 1050 Wishard Boulevard, RG 4101, Indianapolis, IN, USA, (2) Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, XE 070, Indianapolis, IN, (3) Riley Child Development Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, RI 5837, Indianapolis, IN, (4) Indiana University School of Nursing, Indiana University, NU 433, Indianapolis, IN


Background:
As programs are initiated for STD vaccination, it will be crucial to understand vaccine decision-making among parents and their adolescent children.

Objective:
To examine concordance in decision making for STD vaccination between parent-adolescent pairs across three race/ethnic groups.

Method:
363 parents (ages 24-66; 92% female) and adolescents (ages 12-17; 63% female) were recruited at pediatric clinics and completed separate audio computer-assisted self-interviews. Parent/child race/ethnicity was 33% Latino, 25% African American, and 42% Non-Hispanic White. Locus of decision-making for STD vaccination was measured by a 5-point scale ranging from exclusively parent to exclusively adolescent decision with the middle value designated as an equally shared decision. Parent-adolescent concordance was measured using the Signed-Rank test, and differences between race/ethnic groups were analyzed using non-parametric tests: Kruskal-Wallis (overall) and Wilcoxon (pair-wise).

Result:
34.5% of parents reported that they would be the primary decision-makers regarding STD vaccination, whereas only 15.5% of adolescents saw their parents in this role. Conversely, 33.1% of adolescents reported that they would be the primary decision-maker, whereas only 9.7% of parents saw their adolescents in this role. The largest proportion of parents (55.8%) and children (51.4%), however, selected “equal say”. There were differences between parents and their children in terms of locus of decision-making for all subjects combined and within each race/ethnic subgroup (all Ps<0.05). However, patterns of results differed across ethnic groups (P=0.002), with less Latino parent/adolescent discrepancy compared to other subgroups (both Ps<0.02).

Conclusion:
Many parents and adolescents see decisions around STD vaccination as a shared process. However, a substantial number of adolescents expect greater involvement in decision-making than their parents accord them.

Implications:
As new STD vaccines emerge, immunization programs may need to consider the adolescents' attitudes as well as the attitudes of their parents in order to optimize program effectiveness.