The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Results from the NCSD/CDC Internet Assessment

Mary McFarlane1, Rachel E. Kachur2, Kathleen O'Connor-Watson3, and Emily Nichols2. (1) Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop E44, Atlanta, GA, USA, (2) Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road E44, Atlanta, GA, USA, (3) NCSD, Washington, DC, USA


Background:
The utility of the Internet as a venue for disease control and prevention has only recently been recognized. As the need has arisen, many program areas have sought guidance from NCSD and CDC regarding Internet-based STD prevention. As a result, CDC and NCSD assessed internet-related STD prevention activities among program areas.

Objective:
To report on programmatic capacity, knowledge, practices and attitudes regarding Internet-based prevention, as well as related future needs. Next steps will include the development of an online resource, training programs and standardized guidelines for program areas.

Method:
A mixed-method survey was developed and sent to all full members of NCSD, comprising all 65 program areas. Results were entered and analyzed in SPSS.

Result:
53 surveys were completed and returned. 71% (n=46) of program areas responded. Only 15% of respondents stated that all STD patients are queried about online sex partners. 47% of respondents use the Internet for online partner notification but only 40% have written protocols to guide this activity. 29% are using the Internet for outreach but only 7% have written protocols in place. The top three barriers preventing programs from using the Internet for public health include: internal restrictions (65%), lack of personnel (57%), and lack of financial means (44%). The majority of participants want training to use the Internet for partner notification (67%), health education (67%), and online outreach (57%). Many areas require training for basic computer tasks such as using search engines or entering chat rooms.

Conclusion:
Program areas are differentially prepared to incorporate the Internet into programmatic efforts. Protocol development and training are urgently needed, as are guidelines, technical assistance and staffing/financial plans.

Implications:
Program areas will learn what the CDC and NCSD will be undertaking to help with Internet-based STD prevention activities.