The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Substance Use Disorder Screening in a Public STD Clinic

Karla Imbus1, Charlotte H. Robertson2, Nancy Beals3, Janet N. Arno4, Terrell Zollinger5, and Robert Saywell5. (1) Sexually Transmitted Disease Control, Marion County Health Department, Bell Flower Clinic, 1101 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, IN, USA, (2) Bell Flower Clinic, Marion County Health Department, 1101 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, USA, (3) Drug Free Marion County, 2506 Willowbrook Parkway, Indianapolis, IN, USA, (4) Marion County Health Department, Bell Flower Clinic, 1101 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, IN, USA, (5) Family Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, The Bowen Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA


Background:
Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is a validated means of identifying those at risk for substance use disorders, decreasing substance abuse and improving clinical outcomes.

Objective:
We examined the prevalence of substance use disorders using SBIRT at a public STD clinic along with 3 primary care clinics.

Method:
We used the CAGE-AID and NIAAA screening instruments to determine which patients were at risk for or had a probable diagnosis of a substance use disorder. For those positively identified, we provided a brief intervention consisting of one 5-minute counseling session that included motivational interviewing and staging the patient's readiness for change. Those with a probable diagnosis of a substance use disorder were referred to treatment. All were provided with educational materials identifying the health risks associated with substance use.

Result:
: Whereas 3 to 9% of primary care clinic patients screened positive for at-risk or probable diagnosis of a substance use disorder, a striking 46.8% prevalence was found among those attending the STD Clinic. Of these, >50% were in the pre-contemplative stage of change and 24.5% were contemplating or were preparing to take action to decrease their use. As a result, we have incorporated substance use screening with the CAGE-AID/NIAAA instrument and referral to treatment as a standard practice of our STD counseling process.

Conclusion:
STD screening is feasible and acceptable to STD and primary care patients and clinical staff. There is a high prevalence of at risk and probable diagnosis of substance use in the STD setting.

Implications:
This is the first report of the high prevalence of substance related disorders in STD patients diagnosed using a validated instrument, SBIRT and the use of brief interventions an STD clinic setting. Future studies may determine that SBIRT may be useful in STD control.