The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008 - 3:15 PM
B8b

Characteristics of Users of the Internet who Submit Self-obtained Urogenital Samples through the Mail for Testing Sexually Transmitted Infections

Charlotte A. Gaydos1, Mathilda Barnes1, Bulbul Aumakhan1, Nicole Quinn1, Patricia Agreda1, Pamela Whittle2, and Mary Terry Hogan1. (1) Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, 1159 Ross Bldg, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD, USA, (2) Communical Diseses, Baltimore City Health Department, 210 Guilford Ave, Baltimore, MD, USA


Background:
The Internet has the potential to reach persons at risk for STIs and recruit them to mail self-obtained samples for testing. An Internet educational and screening recruitment website, www.iwantthekit.org, has been in use for women since 2004 and for men since 2006.

Objective:
To ascertain characteristics of women and men who use the Internet to request home sampling kits for STIs.

Method:
Participants requested free kits for home collection of urogenital samples via the Internet or calling a toll-free phone number. Self-obtained samples were collected and questionnaires were completed for demographics, perceptions of use, and sexual risk history. Samples were tested using nucleic acid amplification tests.

Result:
Of 1011 females: 54.3% reported a history of an STI; 58.2% reported multiple partners; 13.7% used condoms consistently; 89.8% preferred to collect own specimen; 92.3% rated collection easy/very easy; and, 89.3% stated they would use the Internet again. Of 113 men: 31.1% reported a history of an STI; 71.4% reported multiple partners; 17.5% used condoms consistently; 86.9% preferred to collect own specimen; a majority rated collection easy/very easy- 99% - urine and 89% - penile swab, and 87.7% would use the Internet again. More than a third of female (41.1%) and male (44.6%) users were high school educated and reported an annual income of $10,000-50,000 (females, 47.4%-62.0%; males, 50.0%-53.2%, depending on age < or > 21 yr). Most had insurance (females, 62.1%; males, 56.4%).

Conclusion:
Internet recruitment for home-sampling to detect STIs is feasible. High-risk sexual behavior was reported. User characteristics indicate this program may reach high-risk populations not accessing STD clinic services. Making self-obtained urogenital samples available via the Internet may provide new diagnostic options for control of STIs.

Implications:
Further research could identify how to better implement this type program into public health practice and into wider geographical areas.