The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008 - 10:30 AM
A3c

The Effectiveness of Respondent-Driven Sampling to Recruit Minority and Hard-to-Reach MSM for STD/HIV Behavioral Surveillance

Carey V. Johnson1, Matthew J. Mimiaga2, Sari L. Reisner1, Ashley M. Tetu1, Kevin Cranston3, David S. Novak4, and Kenneth H. Mayer5. (1) Fenway Community Health, Prudential Tower, 4th Floor, 800 Boylston Street, Boston, MA, USA, (2) Fenway Community Health and Harvard Medical School, Prudential Tower, 4th Floor, 800 Boylston Street, Boston, MA, USA, (3) MA Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, (4) Division of STD Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 305 South Street, Room 560, Boston, MA, USA, (5) Fenway Community Health and Brown University/Miriam Hospital, Boston, MA, USA


Background:
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a relatively new sampling method that relies on peer networks to access hard-to-reach populations, including injection drug users, sex workers and MSM. RDS is increasingly used by scientists and program managers for STD/HIV surveillance.

Objective:
The goal was to assess the ability of RDS to recruit a diverse population of MSM in the Boston area.

Method:
Between March 2006-May 2007, 126 MSM were recruited using a modified RDS sampling method. All participants completed a survey at Fenway Community Health (FCH), a freestanding healthcare facility specializing in HIV/AIDS and serving lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender populations in Boston.

Result:
Traditional FCH recruitment methods yield samples comprised of 15%-30% racial/ethnic minority MSM. For the current study, 55% of participants were non-white, of which 83% were Black/African-American. Eleven percent identified as Latino/Hispanic. Forty-four percent reported an annual income of <$2,000, and 21% did not have a regular place to live during the preceding year. Non-white participants were significantly more likely to earn <$2,000 annually relative to white participants (P < 0.05). The majority of MSM (64%) identified as gay; 30% identified as bisexual; 2% identified as heterosexual; 3% other. Overall, 12% were not “out” (i.e. had not told anyone that they are attracted to or have sex with men). Of those who were not out, 87% were non-white. With regard to serostatus, 54% were HIV-infected; 3% did not know their HIV status.

Conclusion:
This study provides evidence that a modified RDS strategy can effectively engage hard-to-reach MSM, including MSM who are non-white, low-income and/or who have not disclosed their male-to-male orientation to others.

Implications:
RDS can be an effective sampling strategy for hard-to-reach MSM at increased risk for STDs/HIV. This has important implications for engaging ethnic/racial minority MSM in STD/HIV surveillance and prevention interventions.