The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 - 10:30 AM
C2b

Can Self-collected Vaginal Swabs Facilitate Testing for Repeat Chlamydia trachomatis Infections among STD Clinic Clients?

Fujie Xu1, David H. Martin2, Bradley P. Stoner3, Leandro Mena4, Stephanie N. Taylor2, Kathleen Hutchins1, John Papp1, and Lauri E. Markowitz1. (1) Division of STD Prevention, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E-02, Atlanta, GA, USA, (2) Section of Infectious Diseases, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, (3) Assoc. Professor, Anthropology and Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1114, St. Louis, MO, USA, (4) Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS, USA


Background:
The 2006 CDC treatment guidelines recommend rescreening women three months after treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection.

Objective:
To determine if home-based, self-collected vaginal swabs can increase rescreening for CT compared with rescreening in the clinic.

Method:
The study is a non-blinded, randomized intervention trial. Women/girls >16 years who had been treated for Chlamydia were enrolled from STD clinics in New Orleans, St. Louis and Jackson. After informed consent, women/girls were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to the Clinic Group (given an appointment to return to clinic), or the Home Group (collect a vaginal swab at home and mail it to the laboratory) for chlamydia testing. Rescreening was scheduled at 3 months following treatment, with a reminder call made to all women 2 weeks before scheduled retesting.

Result:
A total of 792 participants were enrolled from October 2004 through August 2007. Follow-up will continue through November 2007. This preliminary analysis includes 724 women (enrolled before June 1, 2007). The mean age was 22 years; 93% were African American; there were no demographic differences between study groups. Overall, 84 (23.4%) of 359 women assigned to the Clinic Group returned for rescreening and 111 (30.4%) of 365 women assigned to the Home Group mailed in a self-collected vaginal swab (p=0.03). Only 15.6% of women in the Clinic Group and 21.9% of women in the Home Group were retested within 4-weeks of scheduled rescreening (p=0.03).

Conclusion:
Chlamydia rescreening rates were low among STD attendees despite an innovative strategy to increase them. However, home-based, self-collected vaginal swabs clearly provide women an alternative to clinic-based rescreening for Chlamydia.

Implications:
The reasons for apparent low interest in rescreening among female STD clinic clients require further study. In the meantime, allowing women to choose self-collected vaginal swabs has the potential to increase rescreening rates.