D3c STI Vaccination: What Do Adult Women Want?

Thursday, March 11, 2010: 9:00 AM
Grand Ballroom B (M4) (Omni Hotel)
Gregory Zimet, PhD1, Lynne Sturm, PhD1, Rose Mays, PhD, RN2, Rita Bair, MD, MPH1 and Susan Rosenthal, PhD3, 1Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 2Department of Family Health Nursing, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, 3Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY

Background: As US licensure of HPV vaccine for women over 26 years of age is under consideration, it is important to understand preferences regarding HPV/STI vaccination.

Objectives: To identify vaccination preferences of adult women.

Methods: Mothers accompanying adolescents to medical appointments completed surveys. 9 items assessed vaccine acceptability. Each described a unique scenario defined in terms of four dimensions: mode of transmission (STI; non-STI), vaccine efficacy (50%; 70%, 90%), infection severity (acute, chronic, fatal), and availability of behavioral prevention (yes/no). Each vaccine was rated on a 0-100 scale. Conjoint analysis generated part-worth utilities (PWUs), which reflected relative preferences across dimensions.

Results: Respondents were 258 women of diverse racial/ethnic background, ages 27-55 (M=39). The highest rated vaccine (M=86) was: non-STI; 90% efficacious; prevents fatal infection; no behavioral means of prevention. The lowest rated vaccine (M=74) was: non-STI vaccine; 50% efficacious; prevents chronic infection; behavioral prevention available. Severity of infection strongly contributed to ratings with a relative preference for a vaccine that prevents fatal infection (PWU=6.5) compared to one that prevents chronic (PWU=-2.4) or acute infection (PWU=-4.0). Efficacy also strongly influenced ratings with a relative preference for a 90% efficacious vaccine (PWU=3.9) compared to a 70% (PWU=.2) or 50% (PWU=-4.1) efficacious vaccine. Availability of behavioral protection and mode of transmission had minimal effects on ratings.

Conclusions: These results suggest that many adult women are interested in vaccination and do not distinguish between STI and non-STI vaccines. Prevention of a potentially fatal infection, like HPV, and high vaccine efficacy were the main drivers of preference ratings.

Implications for Programs, Policy, and/or Research: This research suggests that HPV vaccination should be highly acceptable to many adult women. Further, it indicates that information emphasizing the high efficacy of HPV vaccines and the morbidity/mortality associated with HPV infection may encourage adult women to get vaccinated.