Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Pre-Function Lobby & Grand Ballroom D2/E (M4) (Omni Hotel)
Background:
The efficacy of patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) and inSPOT, a web-based partner notification service, in increasing partner treatment and/or notification among men who have sex with men (MSM) has not been evaluated.Objectives:
To describe enrollment ofMethods:
We enrolled MSM with chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in a randomized, controlled trial with four arms: inSPOT alone, PDPT alone, inSPOT and PDPT combined (inSPOT/PDPT), and standard partner management. Men were offered enrollment when contacted for partner management. Participants completed short baseline and follow-up interviews approximately 2 weeks apart. Participants could contact partners themselves or have study staff manage partners.Results:
We attempted to offer enrollment to 551 men. Seventy-eight (14%) enrolled, 155 (28%) were ineligible, 281 (51%) refused, and 37 (7%) were not contacted. The study was halted early due to low enrollment. Among the 78 enrollees, 53 (68%) completed baseline and follow-up interviews. Of these 53 men, 13, 10, 17, and 13 were assigned to the PDPT, inSPOT, inSPOT/PDPT, and standard arms, respectively. These 53 participants provided information about 193 partners. Across all study arms, among partners notified by participants, most were notified in person (38%), by telephone (34%), or by email (22%). Of the 27 men assigned to the inSPOT or inSPOT/PDPT arms, 1 (4%) used inSPOT to notify at least one partner. Of the 30 men in the PDPT and inSPOT/PDPT arms, 24 (80%) reported giving PDPT to ≥1 partner.Conclusions:
Few MSM are willing to enroll in a randomized trial comparing partner notification methods. PDPT is highly acceptable, but almost noImplications for Programs, Policy, and/or Research:
Randomized trials of partner notification strategies may not be feasible in MSM