P114 Is Partner Age Associated with Unprotected Anal Sex Risk Behavior for HIV/STI Transmission in a Diverse Sample of Substance-Using MSM?

Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Hyatt Exhibit Hall
Gordon Mansergh, PhD, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, GA, Beryl Koblin, PhD, Lab for Infectious Disease Prevention, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, Sharon Hudson, PhD, Health Research Association, Los Angeles, CA and Stephen Flores, PhD, CDC, Atlanta, GA

Background:  Research, although limited, suggests that relative partner age may be a particularly important mixing factor to consider in HIV/STI transmission risk among MSM, who are at hightened risk for HIV transmission.

Objectives:  To better understand relative age-related sexual mixing by respondent HIV status among high-risk, substance-using MSM, and whether having a >10 year younger or older casual sex partner may be linked to heightened HIV/STI risk.

Methods:  A convenience sample of substance-using MSM was enrolled in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, and San Francisco (n=2039). Partner age groupings were:  >10 years ”Younger”, >10 years “Older”, and <10 years (“Similar”) age relative to the respondent.  Multivariate models analyzed demographic factors (including partner age; Similar age as referent) associated with sexual risk behavior, stratified by respondent HIV status.  

Results:  23% (n=471), 16% (n=332), and 61% (n=1236) of respondents reported on risk behavior with a recent Younger, Older, and Similar age partner, respectively. Among HIV-negative respondents:  In multivariate analysis, respondents who had a Younger (vs. Similar) age partner were less likely to report having unprotected receptive anal sex with that partner (OR=0.6, 95% CI=0.3-0.9). Relative partner age was not associated with respondent unprotected insertive anal sex. Among HIV-positive respondents:  Respondents who had a Younger (vs. Similar) age partner were more likely to report unprotected insertive anal sex with that partner (OR=1.9, CI=1.2-2.9); relative partner age was not associated with unprotected receptive anal sex.

Conclusions:  Associations between age-related sexual mixing and risk behavior vary by HIV-status, reflecting differential risk for HIV/STI transmission, particularly for HIV-positive men with younger partners. Efforts to curb HIV/STI infection should address all partner age groups of HIV-negative and -positive men.

Implications for Programs, Policy, and Research:  Sexual age mixing behavior requires more research, and strategies should be targeted to address mixing dynamics that facilitate HIV/STI transmission.