B3.6 Risk Among Youth with Discordant Sexual Identity and Sexual Behavior: Representative Data From the 2005-2009 New York City Youth Risk Behavior Surveys

Tuesday, March 13, 2012: 4:05 PM
Greenway Ballroom D/E
Preeti Pathela, PhD, Bureau of STD Control and Prevention, The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Long Island City, NY, Leena Gupta, MPH, Epidemiology Services, NYC Dept of Health & Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY and Julia A. Schillinger, MD, MSc, Bureau of STD Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY

Background: Sexual identity may not be congruent with reported sex of partners (sexual behavior). Little is known about risk behaviors among youth with identity-behavior discordance.

Objectives: We quantify identity-behavior discordance among a population-based sample of adolescents, and sexual and substance use behaviors among concordant and discordant groups.

Methods: Sexually active male and female respondents to the 2005-2009 NYC Youth Risk Behavior Surveys were categorized into 2 groups based on 9 permutations of sexual identity (straight, gay/lesbian, bisexual) and the sex of lifetime sexual contacts (males, females, males and females): concordant (e.g., includes gay-identifying males reporting male partners) and discordant (e.g., includes bisexual-identified females reporting only male partners). We present weighted prevalence and adjusted risk estimates of risk behaviors among these groups.

Results: Ten percent of 5279 females and 3.8% of 5597 males had identity-behavior discordance. Among females, the discordant reported more risk than the concordant group regarding most indicators, including age <13 years at first sex (43% vs. 23%, p<.0001), >2 partners in last 3 months (22% vs. 12%, p=.018), alcohol/drugs at last sex (21% vs. 11%,p=.007), age <13 at first alcoholic drink (46% vs. 29%,p<.0001). Male discordant and concordant groups differed in number of recent partners and condom use at last sex (63% vs. 79%, p=.004). Males with discordance were less likely to report condom use at last sex (aOR=0.47; 95%CI=0.29-0.74) and females with discordance were more likely to report >2 recent partners (aOR=1.83; 95%CI=1.17-2.87), compared to concordant groups and adjusted for potential confounders.

Conclusions: Youth with discordant sexual identity and behavior exhibit risky behaviors associated with STD/HIV.

Implications for Programs, Policy, and Research: Knowledge of discordance between identity and behavior will inform health care providers’ assessment of STD/HIV risk. Reducing social stigma experienced by youth of minority sexual identities may reduce identity-behavior discordance and its associated risk behaviors.