P95 Maximizing Use of Limited Resources by Reducing Chlamydia Screening Outside of Criteria Among Females Ages >25 Years Receiving Family Planning Services

Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Hyatt Exhibit Hall
Titilayo Ologhobo, MPH1, Kelly Morrison Opdyke, MPH2, Melissa Nelson, MSc1, Alicia Ventura, MPH3, Rachel Baum, LMSW3 and Dawn Middleton, BS1, 1Region II Infertility Prevention Project, Cicatelli Associates Inc, New York, NY, 2Cicatelli Associates Inc, New York, NY, 3Clinical and Community Health Programs, Public Health Solutions, New York, NY

Background: The goal of the Region II Infertility Prevention Project (IPP) is to decrease the prevalence of chlamydial infections and sequelae through targeted screening of sexually active females aged ≤25 years. Diagnostic testing of females aged >25 years with risk factors is recommended.  High rates of screening among females aged >25 years with low identification of infection (<3%) has been observed in family planning clinics.

Objectives: Assess the impact of a team-based approach to reducing Chlamydia screening among a cohort of low prevalence females aged >25 years receiving family planning services in NYC.

Methods: IPP Prevalence Monitoring Data for 21,809 Chlamydia tests in non-pregnant females aged >25 years that attended 6 clinics providing family planning services in New York City was analyzed. Trends in test volume, number of positive tests and CT positivity rates from CY2005-CY 2010 were examined to determine the impact of the team-based approach.

Results: From CY2005-CY2010, CT test volume among females aged >25 years decreased by 60.4% from 6,781 to 2,685 tests. The number of CT cases identified decreased by 18.5% from 92 to 75 cases.  CT positivity among females >25 years across all years remained less than 3%. 

Conclusions: Activities to reduce over-screening among females aged >25 years resulted in a significant decrease in test volume and a minor decrease in CT cases identified.

Implications for Programs, Policy, and Research: Reducing rates of CT screening in a low prevalence population is possible using a team-based approach and should be applied in other settings. Resources saved can be used to target screening to populations most in need.