Background:Widespread resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to penicillin, tetracycline, and fluoroquinolones has challenged effective treatment and control; recent international case reports of cefixime, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin resistance suggest remaining treatment options are now additionally threatened.
Objectives:To explore trends in antimicrobial susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae we reviewed provincial laboratory data from British Columbia, 2006-2011.
Methods:Susceptibility testing was performed for all N. gonorrhoeae isolated by culture in-house or forwarded to the provincial laboratory. Standard breakpoints defined resistance or intermediate-resistance (non-susceptibility) for penicillin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and spectinomycin. Elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) at serial dilutions ≥0.064 were explored for cefixime/ceftriaxone, and ≥0.5 for azithromycin. Non-susceptibility/elevated MIC was compared by year, site of infection, sex, and age.
Results:1334 isolates representing ~20% of all reported gonorrhea cases were analyzed. Non-susceptibility to penicillin was established at baseline. Non-susceptibility to tetracycline and ciprofloxacin increased over the period of study, reaching 93% and 69%, respectively, in 2010. All isolates were susceptible to spectinomycin. None had MIC ≥0.5 for cefixime or ceftriaxone, and only 1% had MIC ≥2.0 for azithromycin; however, elevated MIC to these agents showed a steady geometric rise, particularly in 2009-10 (43% cefixime/33% ceftriaxone MIC ≥0.064, 76% azithromycin MIC ≥0.5, 2010). Non-susceptibility (penicillin/tetracycline/ciprofloxacin) and elevated MIC (cefixime/ceftriaxone/azithromycin) were consistently higher among males versus females and highest at rectal and pharyngeal sites. 2011 data will be presented.
Conclusions:Increases in elevated MIC to cefixime/ceftriaxone/azithromycin were superimposed on a background of established resistance to penicillin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin, and could be a warning sign of impending gonococcal resistance to first-line treatments.
Implications for Programs, Policy, and Research:Results underscore the need for timely evolution of treatment recommendations and substantiate distinct treatment strategies based on site of infection/sex. Ongoing surveillance is critical and may benefit from enhancements including linkage to epidemiological/clinical details and novel methods for measuring resistance in NAAT-positive specimens.