P84 Increasing Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Retesting Rates in a Student Health Center (SHC) Using a Quality Improvement Approach

Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Hyatt Exhibit Hall
Gale Burstein, MD, MPH1, Susan Mancuso, MSN/FNP2, Kelly Morrison Opdyke, MPH3, Melissa Kyriakos Nelson, MSc3, Heather Lindstrom, PhD4 and Dawn Middleton, BS3, 1Division of General Pediatrics, SUNY at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, 2Health Services, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 3Cicatelli Associates Inc, New York, NY, 4Bureau of Disease Control, Erie County Department of Health, Buffalo, NY

Background: CDC recommends retesting all females and males approximately 3 months after treatment for chlamydia (CT) or gonorrhea (GC), or whenever they next seek medical care in the 12 months following initial treatment.  From May 2009 to May 2011, 16.5% (27/164) of students treated for CT/GC at University at Buffalo Student Health Services were retested within approximately 3 months (42-90 days).

Objectives: To monitor the impact of implementing a new process for increasing rates for test of reinfection (TOR) among students treated for CT/GC as part of a clinic-based quality improvement initiative.

Methods: Beginning August 2011, work flow, processes and staff roles/responsibilities were re-engineered under the Nurse Coordinator’s leadership: 1) Treatment – students with a positive CT/GC test result must see a provider to receive treatment (versus picking up a prescription only); medications are dispensed at no cost to student on site; 2) Letter – providers give students a standard letter with information about treatment and follow-up including TOR; students are advised that they will be contacted to return for TOR within 6 weeks; 3) Reminder – students receive a computer-generated TOR reminder from SHC and an individual email from the Nurse Coordinator 4-5 weeks after treatment; students who do not return also receive a phone reminder.  Each step is recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR) for process monitoring.

Results: From August to December, 2011, 21 students tested positive for CT (n=18) or GC (n=3).  Overall, 18 students (85.7%) returned for TOR, with an average elapsed time from treatment of 40 days (range: 25-47 days).

Conclusions: TOR rates increased dramatically (from 16.5% to 85.7%) in a university-based clinic following implementation of the Treatment-Letter-Reminder process.

Implications for Programs, Policy, and Research: Providers serving young adults should consider implementing system-level changes to increase the number of patients that return for TOR following treatment, along with systems to monitor retesting rates.