THP 114 CDC-Funded HIV Testing and HIV Service Delivery to Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients Attending STD Clinics in the United States: Associations with Medicaid Expansion

Thursday, September 22, 2016
Galleria Exhibit Hall
Guoshen Wang, MS1, Puja Seth, PhD, MA1, Wei Song, M.B.B.S., PhD., MSPH2, Matthew Hogben, PhD3 and John Gilford, PhD4, 1Program Evaluation Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 2Program Evaluation Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention,, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 3Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 4Program Evaluation Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

Background: Many new HIV diagnoses are made in STD clinics. Partner services have been an STD program priority for many years, but other HIV-related client services might be influenced by health care system changes. We examined HIV service delivery to black and Hispanic/Latino populations seen in STD clinics, comparing Medicaid expansion states (MES) to non-Medicaid expansion states (NMES).

Methods: For 2014, 61 health department jurisdictions submitted data on CDC-funded HIV testing, HIV positivity, linkage to care, partner services, and HIV risk-reduction services. We selected data for black and Hispanic/Latino clinic patients. We stratified data by Medicaid expansion status as of January 2014 and used chi-square analyses for comparisons.

Results: Among blacks, 25 MES conducted 72,667 CDC-funded HIV testing events in STD clinics; 26 NMES conducted 212,144. Linkage within 90 days differed for blacks by Medicaid expansion status 59.9% (MES) versus 51.5% (NMES), p<.01, but interviews for partner services did not differ by expansion status (72.2% vs. 74.1%, p=.40).  Additionally, MES conducted 45,555 CDC-funded HIV testing events in STD clinics among Hispanics/Latinos; NMES conducted 49,900. Linkage within 90 days did not differ by Medicaid expansion status, 72.4% versus 73.1%, p=.82, nor did the proportion interviewed for partner services, 78.3% versus 79.1%, p=.76. Finally, in MES, referral rates among blacks for HIV risk-reduction services was 56.5% versus 75.5% in NMES, p<.001. The association was reversed for Hispanics/Latinos, 83.9% versus 77.4%, p<.02.

Conclusions: Partner services interviews, a long-standing staple of STD clinics, did not differ by Medicaid expansion status in 2014 for racial/ethnic minority patients. Other services differed, but the direction of the associations by population were not always as expected.