6B3 Are STD Campaigns Having a Perceived Impact on Youth's Attitudes, Norms and Behaviors?

Friday, September 23, 2016: 10:00 AM
Salon E
Allison Friedman, MS1, Christopher Harper, PhD2, Melissa Habel, MPH3, Matthew Hogben, PhD4, Mary McFarlane, PhD3, Kate Brookmeyer, Ph.D.5 and Rachel Kachur, MPH4, 1Division of STD Prevention, CDC, NCHHSTP, Atlanta, GA, 2Divsion of Adolescent and School Health/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 3Division of STD Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, GA, 4Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 5Division of Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

Background: Few data exist about whether media campaigns are changing STD-testing norms or behaviors among youth nationally. We evaluated whether recent media campaigns (in general) are perceived to impact STD-testing attitudes and behaviors among youth (ages 15-25), and whether awareness of a national STD-testing campaign is associated with greater perceived impact.

Methods: Through a national online survey (2013), we assessed youths’ (N=4017) perceived impact of recent STD/testing media campaigns on the social acceptability of, and open communication about, STD testing.  Perceived impact was ranked using a 4-point scale, from no impact to very big impact.  Participants then reported whether campaign messages made them personally more or less likely (or neither) to: think more positively about STD testing; openly communicate about STDs/testing with a friend, partner or health care provider; and get tested for STDs. Finally, responses of youth who reported awareness of the national GYT (Get Yourself Tested) campaign, based on name and logo recognition, were compared to GYT-unaware youth.

Results: A majority of youth reported that campaigns had a positive impact on STD-testing acceptability (58.7%) and open communication (57.1%). Over one-third reported thinking more positively about STD testing (36.9%), being more likely to communicate about STDs/testing with a partner (35.6%) and provider (36.5%), and being more likely to get tested for an STD (35.8%). GYT-aware youth, representing 13% of all respondents, were significantly more likely to report that campaigns had a positive impact on STD-testing acceptability (aOR= 2.7, 95%CI=1.9-3.9) and open communication (aOR= 3.5, 95%CI=2.5-5), and all measures of personal impact, compared to GYT-unaware youth.

Conclusions: A majority of youth believe campaigns have positive impacts on STD-related communication and testing among people their age; roughly one-third report personal impacts. Awareness of the GYT campaign was positively associated with perceived campaign impacts.