3A5 National Scale-up of a Novel Dual HIV/Syphilis Rapid Diagnostic Test: Perspectives of Key Stakeholders in Malawi

Thursday, September 22, 2016: 11:45 AM
Salon C
Brandy Maddox, MPH, MCHES1, Shaunta Wright, MPH2, Hazel Namadingo, BSc3, Virginia Bowen, PhD, MHS4, Geoffrey Chipungu, MBBS, DTM&H, FCPath(SA)Micro5 and Mary Kamb, MD, MPH2, 1Health Services Research and Evaluation Branch/Program Evaluation Team, Division of STD Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, GA, 2Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 3Malawi Epidemiology Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi, 4Epidemiology and Statistics Branch, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 5Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lilongwe, Malawi

Background: The World Health Organization recommends at least 95% of pregnant women receive syphilis testing at their first antenatal care visit, as untreated infections can lead to severely adverse pregnancy outcomes. In Malawi, pregnant women routinely receive HIV testing, but only 10% are tested for syphilis. We assessed potential barriers to national scale-up of a novel dual-platform rapid diagnostic test (RDT) integrating syphilis with HIV testing on one device.  

Methods: During June–July 2015, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 healthcare providers, laboratorians, Ministry of Health leaders, and agency representatives working in prevention of mother-to-child transmission in Malawi. Participants were asked about the importance of the RDT, concerns using and procuring the RDT, and recommendations for national expansion. Data were analyzed using NVivo 10.

Results: Participants viewed the test favorably, citing the importance of dual RDTs for preventing missed opportunities for syphilis diagnosis and treatment, improving infant outcomes, and increasing syphilis testing coverage. Participants believed the dual RDT may prevent syphilis test stock-outs resulting from the national prioritization of HIV test procurement.  Primary technical concerns were about the additional procedural steps needed to perform the test, the possibility that testers may not adhere to required waiting times before interpreting results, and difficulty reading and interpreting test results lines. Most strongly believed pregnant women would be unwilling to pay for a dual RDT and Ministry funding would be necessary. Participants thought national scale-up would require demonstration of cost-savings, training of testers, clarity on populations to be tested, revisions to testing guidelines and algorithms, and a reliable supply chain.

Conclusions: Stakeholders largely support implementation of an HIV/syphilis RDT as a feasible alternative to current antenatal testing. Scale-up will require addressing perceived barriers; negotiating changes to existing algorithms and guidelines; and Ministry of Health approval and funding to support training of staff and procurement of supplies.