CDC NIP/NIC Page
CDC NIP/NIC Home Page

Not yet assigned to a slot
159

A Unique Assessment of Hospital Infection Control Policies in Los Angeles County

Vi T. Nguyen1, Christina Mijalski2, Martha Stokes1, Vichuda Lousuebsakul1, Marifi Pulido1, and Dulmini Kodagoda1. (1) Los Angeles County Immunization Program, 3530 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA, USA, (2) National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA


Learning Objectives for this Presentation:
By the end of the presentation, participants will be able to assess hospital infection control (HIC) policies by disease, hospital size, and services offered.

Background:
Because hospitals traditionally are primary reporters of vaccine-preventable disease (VPD) cases (via emergency rooms (ER) or among staff), a comprehensive HIC policy assessment can aid disease control/containment efforts with hospitals during a VPD case/outbreak among patients/staff.

Objectives:
Examine Los Angeles County (LAC) HIC policy existence and enforcement for measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B (hepB), varicella, pertussis, haemophilus influenza type B (Hib), and influenza exposures.

Methods:
During April-June 2004, a telephone survey was administered to LAC hospital infection control practitioners (ICPs), assessing HIC policy existence and enforcement. Results were analyzed by disease, hospital size, and services using logistic regression.

Results:
Of 93 responding hospitals, 53.8% had 200+ beds and 77.4% had ERs. Excluding hepB, isolation was the primary HIC measure. Second was respiratory droplet precautions for influenza, pertussis, mumps, Hib, rubella (range:24.7%-38.7%) and negative air pressure rooms for measles(46.2%), varicella(46.2%). For hepB, “standard precautions”(79.6%) was most frequent. Bed number and having ER services didn't statistically affect having a VPD-specific HIC policy. With regard to policy type, 200+ bed hospitals were more likely than <200 bed hospitals to indicate negative pressure rooms as a HIC measure (OR: 3.24; 95%CI: 1.25-8.40).

HIC employee compliance was enforced primarily through periodic review/observation and mandatory seminars (VPD range:76.3-71.0%; 14.0-17.2%, respectively). There were no statistical differences by bed number or having ER services for the existence or type of compliance enforcement. Twenty hospitals (21.5%) had no HIC enforcement for Hib, 16.1% for pertussis or influenza, 9.7% for hepB, 8.6% for mumps, 7.5% for rubella, 6.5% for varicella, and 5.4% for measles.


Conclusions:
Lack of uniform policies and enforcement will necessitate a higher level of involvement by the LAC health department when managing a VPD exposure/outbreak in hospitals.

See more of Posters
See more of The 40th National Immunization Conference (NIC)