6th Annual Public Health Information Network Conference: The Effect of Automated Case Detection on Timeliness of Case Reporting of Influenza-Associated Hospitalization

The Effect of Automated Case Detection on Timeliness of Case Reporting of Influenza-Associated Hospitalization

Sunday, August 24, 2008
South/West Halls
Brett R. South, MS , Division of Epidemiology, COE Public Health Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Lisa Wyman, MPH , Bureau of Epidemiology, Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT
Shuying Shen, Master, of, Statistics , Division of Epidemiology, COE Public Health Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Melissa S. Dimond, MPH , Bureau of Epidemiology, Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT
Robert T. Rolfs, MD, MPH , Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT
Adi Gundlapalli, MD, PhD, MS , Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Matthew Samore, MD , Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Catherine Staes, BSN, MPH, PhD , Dept of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a pilot evaluation to determine the effects of automated case detection on the timeliness of case reporting using data extracted from the Utah National Electronic Telecommunications System for Surveillance (NETSS). We hypothesized that presence of an automated case detection system influences timeliness of reporting and compliance with state law for “reporting within three working days”.

METHODS

Data for 364 reported influenza-associated hospitalizations from two urban counties were extracted from NETSS for the 2005-2006 influenza season. To limit confounding introduced by between county reporting and evaluate the effects of automated detection alone, we focused only on cases hospitalized in the same county of residence (n=275).  The interval between the date of lab test and local health department report was calculated to include only work days and exclude holidays.  Timeliness of case reporting was evaluated using the hazard ratio (HR) from Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Case reporting was skewed and took as long as 37 days for facilities using automated case detection systems.  Proportions of cases reported within three working days were nearly identical for facilities using an automated or manual detection system.  There was no significant difference in the timeliness of reporting after three working days (HR= 1.034; p=0.9139).  After allowing 10 working days to accommodate routine weekly workflow, cases continued to be reported including 12 cases from facilities with automated detection and six where manual detection was used.

CONCLUSION

Results from this pilot study inform current projects underway by the Utah Center of Excellence in Public Health Informatics. When assessing the timeliness of case reporting, considerations must be made for reporting between counties and continued detection of cases using routine case identification processes. The solution may be a shared reporting database with work already in progress in the state of Utah.

See more of: Poster Session
See more of: Abstracts