Methods: We took a qualitative approach and conducted interviews, observations, and literature review for AEGIS system study, grid attributes descriptions, and development of an evaluation framework. The evaluation framework comprised of: Core principle, evaluation checklist, and comparative analysis. We based the evaluation framework on Ian Foster’s core principle, “Ultimately the Grid must be evaluated in terms of the applications, business value, and scientific results that it delivers, not its architecture.” We expanded the three-point checklist proposed by Ian Foster to a 12-point checklist for evaluating distributed information network architecture for the presence of grid attributes. We then comparatively analyzed the AEGIS system attributes using the expanded grid checklist.
Results: The investigation revealed that AEGIS architecture does in fact map to the key functional attributes defined within a standard grid computing architecture. AEGIS was also found to exhibit other attributes such as timeliness, robustness, and quality-of-data assurance that can potentially overcome biosurveillance domain challenges. However, technically AEGIS does not use classical grid middleware.
Conclusion: AEGIS system is functionally aligned with grid computing architecture. We plan to compare AEGIS with centralized biosurveillance systems in terms of outcome-based performance measures, to study the realized benefits of the grid-based architectural approach.