|
|
The findings and conclusions in these presentations have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy. |
Williford A/B
| |||
B5: Collaboration for STD, HIV, and Teen Pregnancy Prevention: Perspectives on Process, Achievements, Challenges, and Lessons Learned in California | |||
| Moderator: | Danielle M. Sollers | ||
| Summary: | Background/Purpose: In response to a DASH-CDC national initiative, a collaboration work group was established to strengthen partnerships to prevent HIV/AIDS, STD, and unintended pregnancy among school-age youth. Objectives of Symposium: By the end of the symposium, participants will be able to summarize the benefits, challenges, and strategies of collaboration for STD, HIV, teen pregnancy, and education programs. Implications for Programs, Policy, and/or Research: With limited resources, overlapping priority populations, and shrinking categorical funding, collaboration among reproductive health programs is essential for enhancing effectiveness and efficiency. The presentation will assist STD programs to establish and expand collaboration with similar organizations in order to improve multiple outcomes for adolescent reproductive health. |
||
| 3:00 PM | B5a | The National Initiative to Strengthen State Health and Education Agency Partnerships in Order to Improve HIV, STD, and Unintended Pregnancy Prevention among School-aged Youth Danielle M. Sollers | |
| 3:15 PM | B5b | Collaboration from the Perspective of STD Programs and Development of Core Competencies Paul Gibson | |
| 3:30 PM | B5c | Collaboration from the Perspective of HIV/AIDS Programs & Unanticipated Benefits Gail Sanabria | |
| 3:45 PM | B5d | The California Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group (ASHWG) – Background and Formation Paul Gibson | |
| 4:00 PM | B5e | Collaboration from the Perspective of MCAH/OFP Programs and Progress with Data Integration Karen Ramstrom | |
| 4:15 PM | B5f | Collaboration from the Perspective of the California Department of Education (CDE) and Lessons Learned Sharla Smith | |